Add new afterLogin cloud code hook (#6387)
* add new afterLogin cloud code hook * include user on req.user for afterLogin hook
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import { logger } from './logger';
|
||||
|
||||
export const Types = {
|
||||
beforeLogin: 'beforeLogin',
|
||||
afterLogin: 'afterLogin',
|
||||
afterLogout: 'afterLogout',
|
||||
beforeSave: 'beforeSave',
|
||||
afterSave: 'afterSave',
|
||||
@@ -39,10 +40,13 @@ function validateClassNameForTriggers(className, type) {
|
||||
// TODO: Allow proper documented way of using nested increment ops
|
||||
throw 'Only afterSave is allowed on _PushStatus';
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (type === Types.beforeLogin && className !== '_User') {
|
||||
if (
|
||||
(type === Types.beforeLogin || type === Types.afterLogin) &&
|
||||
className !== '_User'
|
||||
) {
|
||||
// TODO: check if upstream code will handle `Error` instance rather
|
||||
// than this anti-pattern of throwing strings
|
||||
throw 'Only the _User class is allowed for the beforeLogin trigger';
|
||||
throw 'Only the _User class is allowed for the beforeLogin and afterLogin triggers';
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (type === Types.afterLogout && className !== '_Session') {
|
||||
// TODO: check if upstream code will handle `Error` instance rather
|
||||
@@ -615,7 +619,8 @@ export function maybeRunTrigger(
|
||||
const promise = trigger(request);
|
||||
if (
|
||||
triggerType === Types.afterSave ||
|
||||
triggerType === Types.afterDelete
|
||||
triggerType === Types.afterDelete ||
|
||||
triggerType === Types.afterLogin
|
||||
) {
|
||||
logTriggerAfterHook(
|
||||
triggerType,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user